PJM Capacity Market Faces September Deadline for Governance Reform
The FERC has given PJM stakeholders until the end of September to agree on governance reforms before it steps in to make changes. Discover how rapid load growth has driven the need for reform, what changes PJM is proposing, and how these shifts could impact your bottom line.
Table of Contents
Jump to a specific section
Key Takeaways
PJM is under pressure from the FERC to overhaul its governance structure by the end of September or face FERC-imposed reforms. PJM already filed a preliminary governance reform proposal on August 21, 2026, focused on giving stakeholders a more supervisory role, longer terms for board members, expanding state participation, and more filing rights with the FERC. The dispute resolution process began on September 1, with the goal of finalizing a reform package before the September 30 deadline.
- PJM stakeholders must agree on governance reforms by September 30
- The reform proposal focuses on expediting decision-making and expanding participation to states
- The FERC’s facilitated dispute resolution process is underway
- Governance reform alone can’t lower capacity prices, but faster decision-making can improve market conditions over time
- PJM’s governance reform will shape wholesale market conditions and infrastructure timelines
Why Is the FERC Requiring PJM Governance Reform?
On July 23, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) assembled a technical conference of PJM executives, stakeholders, and policymakers to understand why the regional transmission organization (RTO) is struggling to keep up with today’s challenging market. FERC Chairman Laura Swett made it very clear what was at stakes, warning that PJM is facing a “grave legitimacy crisis” because market participants are quickly losing confidence in PJM’s decision-making, and “some transmission owners are openly discussing leaving the RTO altogether.”
The current crisis stems from a governance system built for stakeholder consensus, not speed. As competing stakeholder interests slow decisions, rapid PJM load growth is straining the system more every day. With pressures mounting, the FERC set a clear governance reform deadline. PJM stakeholders must agree on reform by the end of September, or the FERC will step in to impose its own changes.
Current PJM Governance Moves Too Slowly
PJM’s current governance process divides stakeholders into five voting sectors, from transmission owners to end-use customers. It requires a two-thirds sector-weighted majority to pass most measures. That threshold means just two sectors can join forces to block a proposal, something that has happened repeatedly on controversial issues. This can make it difficult for PJM to act quickly when new conditions demand prompt decisions.
PJM Can’t Keep Up with Rapid Load Growth
The impact of data centers is at the center of this controversy, as unprecedented PJM demand growth is outpacing the ability to get new generation projects online. PJM’s Long-Term Load Forecast predicts the grid’s peak load to exceed 222,000 megawatts (MW) by 2036. Data center development has already pushed capacity prices to record highs, raising major concerns about whether enough new generation can come online fast enough to maintain a reliable grid.
Key Milestones in PJM’s Governance Reform Process
- August 18: Deadline to register for the FERC’s facilitated dispute resolution discussions
- August 21: Deadline for post-conference public comments. PJM also formally filed its reform proposal with the FERC, ahead of the August 26 deadline.
- September 1: FERC facilitated dispute resolution discussions begin.
- September 30: Deadline for PJM stakeholders to reach an agreement on final reforms.
What Could Happen After the September Deadline?
There are two potential outcomes. If PJM stakeholders reach a consensus during the dispute resolution process, PJM would file the finalized reforms with the FERC for approval. However, if they don’t reach an agreement, the FERC has made it clear that it will step in and impose its own governance changes directly. The FERC hasn’t released any details on what those changes could look like, so businesses within PJM’s footprint will have to wait for the finalized reform package to be officially released this fall.
What Could PJM Reform Mean for Your Business?
PJM’s governance reform decisions will ripple far beyond stakeholder meetings. They’ll ultimately shape wholesale market conditions that directly influence what your business pays for energy. With a more efficient, independent decision-making process, PJM could approve new generation and transmission projects faster to help ease the gap in supply and demand that are currently pushing capacity costs to record highs. It could also improve PJM’s ability to respond to reliability risks before they impact the grid.
For businesses, this period of transition adds a layer of uncertainty to energy procurement that’s worth watching closely. Until PJM reforms are finalized, it’s difficult to predict how quickly new infrastructure will come online or how future capacity costs will trend once the pricing collar expires in 2030. While that uncertainty can complicate your long-term energy strategy, partnering with a trusted energy expert can help. Our team specializes in tailoring energy solutions to provide stability during periods of market volatility. With personalized market insights and ongoing support, your business will stay ahead of market shifts and make confident energy decisions.
5 PJM Reform Developments Businesses Should Watch
While PJM governance reform is still unfolding, the finalized details will shape the market for years to come. Rather than trying to keep track of every headline, here are the most important topics commercial energy buyers should focus on as this process plays out:
- The finalized governance proposal that emerges from the FERC’s dispute resolution process in September.
- Any formal FERC orders or rulings issued regarding PJM’s governance structure.
- Future capacity auction results since governance alone won’t reverse recent PJM capacity price increases.
- Progress on new generation and transmission projects working to catch up with demand.
- Ongoing PJM load growth forecasts and peak demand predictions driven by data center development.
FAQs About the FERC, PJM Capacity, and Governance Reform
Why are PJM capacity prices so high?
Across the PJM power grid, data centers are being built at a rapid rate, and they can be 10 to 50 times more energy intensive than a standard commercial building. As more data centers are built, it puts a significant baseload pressure on the PJM grid and supply can‘t keep up. As a result, PJM capacity prices will be at unprecedented highs through at least 2030.
How does PJM affect electricity prices?
In deregulated energy markets, capacity can represent 10-30% of a commercial fixed energy rate. As PJM capacity costs shift with each auction, so will your business’s monthly bill.
What states are part of the PJM Interconnection?
PJM coordinates the flow of electricity across 13 states, including Delaware, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Maryland, Michigan, New Jersey, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia, as well as Washington D.C.
What is the difference between PJM and an electric utility?
PJM is the regional transmission organization (RTO) that coordinates wholesale electricity markets and manages grid reliability across multiple states. Electric utilities, on the other hand, are the local companies that deliver electricity to homes and businesses, manage monthly billing, and maintain local equipment, like power lines, meters, and substations.
How does data center growth affect the PJM power grid?
Data centers are growing much faster than previous PJM load growth forecasts predicted. New generation projects and infrastructure upgrades can’t keep up with rapid surge in PJM data center energy demand. As a result, cities across PJM’s footprint are experiencing higher electricity rates and more power outages due to an overloaded grid.
Who regulates PJM?
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) is responsible for regulating PJM as a regional transmission organization by reviewing its rules, market rates, and governance structure. While PJM’s own stakeholders handle daily operational decisions, it’s under direct FERC scrutiny.
Your Partner Through PJM’s Evolving Market
Free Consultation No Obligation Expert Guidance About the Author 
Tim Trus
